|

Joseph Piotroski, assistant professor of accounting
| Value Investing: Nine Financial Performance
Signals |
Profitability signals
Positive return on assets
Positive cash flow from operations
Increasing trend in return on assets
Cash flow from operations exceeds net income before
extraordinary items |
Leverage, liquidity, and
source of funds
Decrease in leverage (measured
as LTD to total assets)
Increase in liquidity (measured by the current ratio)
Firm did not issue equity in the preceding year
|
|
Operating-based signals
Improvement in gross margins
Improvement in total asset turnover
|
|
An Accountant Looks at the Market
When he looked at the market,
Joseph Piotroski took a C.P.A.s approach to picking value
stocks: analyze a companys financial statement to see how
the firm is likely to perform.
The assistant professor of accounting
developed a nine-point scale to find the jewels in the financial
rough of undervalued companies. In spring 2001, the studyValue
Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information
to Separate Winners from Losersdrew attention from Smart
Money.
The higher a company ranks
on Piotroskis financial strength scale, the better its stock
performs over both one- and two-year periods, Smart Money
reported.
In Value Investing, Piotroski
concentrates on high book-to-market firms whose stocks traditionally
have low market value despite value in their financial statements.
The key feature about them is that their market value is
actually smaller than the amount of net assets they have recorded
on their financial statements, he said.
These are firms that are
traditionally poor performers. As a result, the market doesnt
like them and they tend to be under-followed by analysts and institutional
investors.
Still, Piotroski notes that as
a group, these stocks historically have strong returns over a
two- to three-year period. What he wondered was whether it was
possible to weed out the poor performers and identify the winners
in advance.
Embedded in that mix of
companies, you have some that are just stellar. Their performance
turns around. People become optimistic about the stock, and it
really takes off, he says. And yet, at the same time, half
of the firms languish; they continue to perform poorly and eventually
de-list or enter bankruptcy.
Research on high book-to-market
stocks isnt new. Eugene
Fama, Robert McCormick Distinguished Service Professor of Finance,
and Robert Vishny, Eric J. Gleacher Distinguished Service Professor
of Finance, were among the first to identify this book-to-market
effect in the early and mid-1990s, respectively. Famas finance
literature has demonstrated that this class of stocks, though
the worst performers as a group, always have the best returns.
Years later, academics are still debating why this effect exists.
Piotroski wrote, The evidence
suggests that the market does not fully incorporate historical
financial information into [stock] prices in a timely manner.
His approach was to see if he could apply a theory that picked
the winners.
Practice What You Preach
As an accounting professor, Piotroski teaches Financial Statement
Analysis to full-time and evening M.B.A. students. He spent three
years as a C.P.A. at Coopers & Lybrand before he left in 1992
to pursue an academic career. While working toward his Ph.D. at
the University of Michigan, Piotroski started tracking the performance
of 20 value stocks that had been in the bottom fifth of low book
value stocks. Looking at the firms financial reports, he
graded the data to measure profitability, capital structure, and
operating efficiency.
It took about a year for Piotroski
to gather and analyze the research. What he found was that this
type of analysis does indeed have predictive power, making it
possible to discern which stocks have standout investment potential
and which would be better left behind. And by investing in the
top performers alone, Piotroskis research shows, the
mean return earned by a high book-to-market investor can be increased
by at least 7.5 percent annually.
Continued
>>
|